**中文版本**

**名称**  
机构投资者持仓分歧度因子

**假设**  
当同一行业内多家重要机构投资者（如顶级公募、社保基金、QFII等）对某只股票的持仓方向出现显著分歧（例如部分大幅增持而部分大幅减持）时，表明市场对该股票的未来预期存在巨大不确定性。这种分歧通常在基本面或消息面出现重大但尚未被市场充分消化的潜在变化时产生。短期内，分歧可能导致股价波动加剧且缺乏明确方向；但从中期看，随着信息逐步明朗，股价将向代表正确预期的一方回归。因此，可以构建策略，在分歧度达到极值时建立仓位，押注于后续的信息明朗化和价格收敛。

**实施方案**  
1.  **数据准备**：收集并整合上市公司定期报告（如季报、年报）中披露的前十大流通股东中的机构投资者持仓变动数据。识别出具有市场影响力的机构类型。
2.  **计算分歧度**：
    *   对每个报告期，计算每只股票在特定行业内，不同类型重要机构投资者持仓变动（例如，持股数量环比变化率）的标准差或基尼系数，作为“机构持仓分歧度”的原始指标。
    *   使用 `ts_zscore` 算子对该原始分歧度进行横截面标准化，以消除市场整体情绪波动的影响。
    *   应用 `ts_decay_linear` 或类似的时序衰减算子，赋予近期报告期的分歧度更高权重，以捕捉最新动态。
3.  **信号生成**：当某股票的标准化的时序加权分歧度突破历史阈值（例如，过去两年内的90%分位数）时，生成信号。可考虑在信号出现后的一段时间内（如下一报告期数据披露前）建立仓位。
4.  **仓位方向**：此因子本身不直接指示多空方向。方向的确立需要结合其他辅助指标，例如：
    *   结合同期股价表现（分歧期内股价相对强势，可能预示增持方观点正确，考虑多头；反之考虑空头）。
    *   或结合基本面趋势（如盈利预测修正方向）来判断哪方机构可能更具前瞻性。

**阿尔法因子优化建议**  
1.  **动态阈值调整**：分歧度的显著性可能随市场波动率变化。建议使用波动率调整阈值，例如在市场波动率高的时期，适当提高触发信号的阈值，以减少假信号。
2.  **机构权重差异化**：不同机构的投资能力和市场影响力不同。可尝试根据机构的历史业绩或管理规模为其持仓变动赋予不同的权重，而不是简单平均计算分歧度，从而使分歧度指标更能反映“聪明钱”的博弈。
3.  **结合事件驱动**：将分歧度因子与特定公司事件（如重大资产重组、核心技术突破、监管调查等）的发布时点结合。在事件窗口期内，若出现高分歧度，其信号强度可能更强。可使用条件算子，在事件发生后的特定时间段内激活或增强该因子的权重。
4.  **行业与市值中性化**：分歧度水平可能受行业特性和公司市值影响。强烈建议在因子构建的最后阶段，采用横截面分组中性化处理（如按行业和市值分组），确保因子收益来源于个股选择而非风格暴露。

---

**English Version**

**Name**  
Institutional Investor Holding Divergence Factor

**Hypothesis**  
When major institutional investors within the same industry exhibit significant divergence in their positioning towards a specific stock, it indicates substantial uncertainty regarding the stock's future prospects. This divergence often arises when there are material, yet not fully digested, changes in fundamentals or news flow. In the short term, such divergence can lead to increased price volatility without a clear trend. However, over the medium term, as information becomes clearer, the stock price tends to converge towards the side representing the correct expectation. Therefore, a strategy can be constructed to establish positions when divergence reaches an extreme, betting on the subsequent information clarification and price convergence.

**Implementation Plan**  
1.  **Data Preparation**: Collect and integrate institutional holding change data from regular company reports, focusing on top circulating shareholders identified as influential market participants.
2.  **Calculate Divergence**:
    *   For each reporting period, calculate a divergence metric for each stock within its specific industry. This could be the standard deviation or Gini coefficient of the holding changes among different types of key institutions.
    *   Use the `ts_zscore` operator to cross-sectionally standardize this raw divergence metric, mitigating the impact of overall market sentiment swings.
    *   Apply a time-series decay operator to assign greater weight to more recent reporting periods, capturing the latest dynamics.
3.  **Signal Generation**: Generate a signal when a stock's normalized, time-weighted divergence breaches a historical threshold. Consider establishing positions within a defined window after the signal appears.
4.  **Position Direction**: This factor does not directly indicate long/short direction. Direction determination requires auxiliary indicators, such as:
    *   Concurrent stock price performance during the divergence period.
    *   Underlying fundamental trend to judge which institutional view might be more prescient.

**Alpha Factor Optimization Suggestions**  
1.  **Dynamic Threshold Adjustment**: The significance of divergence may vary with market volatility. Consider adjusting the signal threshold dynamically.
2.  **Differentiated Institutional Weighting**: Assign different weights to holding changes based on an institution's historical performance or AUM, refining the divergence metric to better reflect the博弈 of "smart money".
3.  **Integration with Event Drivers**: Combine the divergence factor with the announcement timing of specific corporate events. High divergence during event windows might indicate stronger signals.
4.  **Industry and Size Neutralization**: Divergence levels might be influenced by industry characteristics and company size. It is strongly recommended to apply cross-sectional neutralization in the final step of factor construction.